AI tools are already part of everyday software development. Most teams use them for code completion, quick refactoring, or documentation lookup. However, the real productivity gains appear when AI is applied not to isolated prompts, but to repeatable engineering workflows.
In this article, I’ll describe how Windsurf Workflows can be structured to automate common development tasks, why context management becomes a critical factor at scale, and how patterns like Agent Skills from Claude can be applied to Windsurf workflows in practice.
From Prompts to Windsurf Workflows
Ad-hoc prompting works well for one-off questions. But in a production environment, engineers repeatedly perform the same categories of work:
- reviewing changes before opening a pull request
- preparing pull requests with consistent structure
- planning implementation based on ticket requirements
- addressing review feedback
Each of these tasks requires context, consistency, and a predictable outcome. Repeating the same explanations to an AI agent is inefficient and increases cognitive load.
This is where Windsurf Workflows become useful.
A Windsurf Workflow is a reusable, structured prompt designed to solve a specific task in a consistent way. Instead of starting from a blank chat every time, a workflow defines inputs, expectations, and output format upfront.
Why Context Management Matters
Modern AI agents operate within a limited context window. The more information we push into that window, the harder it becomes for the model to reason effectively.
When workflows grow and start interacting with external systems, poor context management can lead to:
- slower responses
- degraded reasoning quality
- inconsistent results
For this reason, workflow design is not only about automation, but also about separating responsibilities and keeping the AI focused on reasoning rather than integration details.
This becomes even more critical when using the MCP model stack: each API call consumes part of the same context window, so keeping MCP responsibilities (data fetching, system orchestration) separate from Windsurf reasoning keeps the agent responsive and predictable.
Agent Skills as a Design Pattern
A clean solution to this problem comes from Agent Skills, a concept popularized by Claude (see Claude Skills for details).
Agent Skills introduce a clear separation between three concerns:
Instructions
A concise description of what the agent should do. This is usually a Markdown document defining goals, constraints, and expected output.
Resources
Static or semi-static files that provide context, such as style guides, templates, or internal documentation.
Scripts
Executable logic that interacts with external systems. Scripts fetch data, update tickets, create pull requests, or perform other side effects outside the AI context.
This separation allows the AI to focus on decision-making and reasoning, while scripts handle integration logic in a deterministic way.
Applying Agent Skills to Windsurf Workflows
Although Agent Skills are often associated with Claude, the same structure can be applied to Windsurf workflows:
- workflows act as instructions
- shared files act as resources
- helper scripts handle external dependencies
This approach keeps workflows modular, composable, and easier to reason about. It also prevents the AI context from being overloaded with implementation details that do not require reasoning.
Workflow Ideas Instead of Rigid Automation
Rather than building workflows that fully replace engineers, this approach focuses on guidance and acceleration.
Examples of workflow ideas include:
- generating structured feedback for code changes
- preparing consistent pull request descriptions
- creating implementation plans from ticket requirements
- summarizing and categorizing review feedback
The key idea is not full automation, but reducing friction and standardizing routine work while keeping engineers in control.
Structuring Workflows for Scale
To make workflows reusable across a team, they should be stored and versioned like any other engineering artifact.
A typical structure includes:
- a dedicated repository for workflows
- a shared resources directory for style guides and templates
- a scripts directory for external integrations
This structure makes workflows discoverable, maintainable, and easy to extend as new use cases appear.
Impact on Engineering Teams
Even without full automation, structured Windsurf Workflows provide tangible benefits:
- reduced time spent on repetitive tasks
- more consistent pull requests and reviews
- less context switching between tools
Instead of replacing engineering judgment, workflows support it by removing unnecessary overhead.
Conclusion
AI becomes truly valuable when it is embedded into real engineering workflows, not just used as a conversational assistant.
By applying the Agent Skills pattern from Claude to development workflows, it is possible to build scalable, maintainable AI-powered tooling that respects context limits and integrates naturally into existing development processes.
For teams working on large codebases, this approach offers a practical way to improve efficiency and consistency without sacrificing control or code quality.
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more practical tips like this, consider subscribing to The iOS Weekly Brief — my weekly Substack newsletter for engineers. Every week, I share handpicked updates, tools, and insights from the development world, focused on real production needs.
You can read it in 5 minutes and stay up to date without spending hours watching every video or reading every changelog.
Join hundreds of developers already following it: vladkhambir.substack.com